Friday, 6 February 2009


Hi People

I have been keeping my contact with these people a secret, for various reasons but that now that I have tried them I have found them wanting. Its time to reveal what they get up to or don't as the case may be.

I first contacted them via email on then 18th October 2008 with this to their 2 offices at these addresses;;

Hi there

I thought I would contact both offices and forward you some information that you may well be able to help me with. I have made numerous attmpts to have the charge of criminal negligence towrds my health n welfare by the welsh assembly and cardiff county council as well as other persons and organisations.

All are made plain on my blogger site at and my youtube site use the search words iamcrazydave to access or do it via the blogger address where video url's are placed. I believe I am being systematically discriminated against on mental health grounds.

Yours David Gabriel aka Crazydave aka Daoud Jibreel

Needless to say I am still trying to gain their assistance but that appears more difficult than it really ought to be, given the catagory.

On the 28th of october having had no reply I sent a chase up email to both offices with this:

Hi there

I am chasing up acknowledgement of receipt of this email as I have yet to hear anything from either the cardiff or london office.

On the 29th Oct from the Wales Office I had this:

Dear Mr Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your enquiry. As you have provided much information we will need to review this before we can provide a response to your enquiry.
We acknowledge your e-mail and will contact you as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully,

Wales Helpline.

Equality and Human Rights Commission-Wales Helpline

On the 30th of Oct 2008 I thanked them they have a legal disclaimer that reads in part as follows:

Legal disclaimer

This email has been originated in the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is an information and guidance service and not a legal advice service. If you require legal advice, please contact a solicitor. This paragraph does not apply to an individual who is assisted under section 28 Equality Act 2006.

If you read section 28 Equality Act 2006 and you are at all familiar with the issues that are highlighted in my blogs then I ought tp be given assitance with my housing situation i.e. A property that still does not conform to minimum standards for airbourne sound and therefore will not meet minimum standards for floor to ceiling sound transmission values. We might come back to that later.

ON the 31st October I sent the welshhelpline this:

Hi there

here is a copy of my latest blog. I thought you ought to have a copy

All the best David Gabriel

Friday, 31 October 2008

With the full blog for ease of this one I have not reproduced it all see part of the Welsh Assembly The Crazydave Files.

On the 4th November 2008 I received this email from them:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

I understand from the information you have provided that you feel you are being discriminated against on the grounds of mental health issues. The legislation which covers this impairment would be the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA).

The DDA imposes duties on those who provide services to the public. The Act makes it unlawful for service providers to discriminate against a disabled person in relation to the service in question. Discrimination occurs when a service provider:

1. treats a disabled person less favourably - for a reason relating to the disabled person's disability - than it treats (or would treat) others to whom that reason does not (or would not) apply; and
2. cannot show that the treatment is justified.
3. Fails to comply with a duty to make reasonable adjustments (imposed on it by section 21, 21E, or Regulations under section 21H of the Act) in relation to the disabled person in specified circumstances; and cannot show that the failure is justified.

A failure to comply with the duty to make reasonable adjustments in relation to providers of services to the public and private clubs will only amount to unlawful discrimination in specified circumstances.

These circumstances are that the effect of the failure is to make it impossible or 'unreasonably difficult' for the disabled person to make use of services or of clubs

Where an individual / individuals feel discrimination may have taken place, we would advise in the first instance, writing formally to the service provider outlining the complaint and suggesting how they feel the issue could be resolved. If the complainants are not satisfied with the response given, they should follow any applicable appeals process. Where the issue is not resolved, the complainants may choose to use mediation services (the local CAB will be able to signpost to local agencies offering this service). At any point during this process, the complainants could issue a disability questionnaire to request more detailed feedback on the matter. Prior to any claim being heard by the county court this process would need to have been exhausted.

You may be able to access further ongoing support with this process from your local MIND group.

In addition to the responsibilities above public bodies are covered by the Disability Equality Duty (see attached).

Unfortunately, due to a limitation of resources, the Commission is unable to support cases directly unless they are strategic. More information on this can be found on our Website

I have attached the Code of practice for Service Providers

I hope this is helpful.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

Equality and Human Rights Commission-Wales Helpline

So on the 4th of November 2008 I replied with this, you will have to excuse the spelling errors but I think you will get the drift:

Hi Anne

What does strategic mean? I had hoped that the blogs would have indicated that I have tried all those agencies that you refer to if you had looked through you will see that Mind Cymru wished to dispose of t6he matter. I see today the Welsh Assembly government is bringing out a new suicide strategy not that it has cared for how mental health sufferes are in-appropriately housed or that they are the victims of harrassment by the so called well adjusted, or neglect by their county councillors or their assembly members or their mp's?

I would have thought that the neglect else why am I still seeking help wuld have been beyond doubt by now. The court on Friday appear to conclude that I was being harrassed last easter sunday that the conspires to that still have the means whereby more is ongoing and that I am being denied the peaceful enjoyment of my home which is made worse on my bad days.

I can only hope that the appropriate housing of mental health suffers is Strategic and some help given by the equality and human rights commission or else why are you all being paid????

all the best David.

I hope the banner regarding 'Rhodri Morgan's cabinet cited in torture of mental health patient' might just be given the consideration that it deserves?????????

On the same day I also sent this additional question to her:

Hi Anne

the other thing I would like to know is do you know what I might have to do in order to gain a public inquiry into the criminal negligence by the Welsh Assembly government et al??? The CAB do not hold up applicants rights to privacy as you will see if you had the time to read the water company blogs.

all the best David Gabriel

To which I had this reply on the same day:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

My understanding is that you would need to complete all other processes including a complaint to the Ombudsman and possibly to the County Court, before seeking a public enquiry on any matter.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

and then she sent me this on the same day:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

My apologies, I was referring to the Commissions legal strategy. Details of this can be found @
If you wish to request formal assistance, please write to the Helpline at:

3rd floor,
3 Callaghan Square,
CF10 5BT
Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

So I sent this same day:

Hi Anne

what does formal assistance mean? If you look at the blogs you will see that I have been given the run around by the ombudsman.David

On the 5th November 2008 I received this:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Formal assistance would be the Commission either intervening in a legal case or supporting one.

Yours faithfully,
Yours faithfully,
Anne Mears-Rees

So on the 5th nov I replied with:

what do you need in the letter??

To which I had this on the 6th november 2008:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your enquiry. The letter should include reference to the alleged breach of one of the equality acts, how this took place and a request for assistance under the Equality Act. You can get more details from the website.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

• To assist an individual in proceedings that relate wholly or partly to alleged breach of one of the equality enactments, where the individual alleges that they have been the victim of the alleged breach, including providing legal advice, legal representation, facilities for settlement or any other form of assistance (s.28).

So on the 7th this was done

For the attention of Anne Mears-Rees 7th Nov 2008

I am forwarding the original email to the equality human rights commission. I believe it ought to be enough to enlist your aid as a letter that you asked for. My postal address is

15 (with held for privacy reasons)

All the best David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184 (copy of original email)

On the 13th November I had this in my inbox:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your enquiry. I have now received you request for assistance. Please provide the following information.

1. Name: David Gabriel

2. Address: 15 (removed for preivacy reasons)

3. Telephone:

4. E mail: (removed for privacy reasons)

5. Which discrimination Strand do you feel applies to your case?

· Disability
· Gender
· Race
· Sexual Orientation
· Age
· Religion & Belief
· Human Rights

6. Please provide details here of the main issues you are raising, for which you wish to receive support.

7. When did the discrimination take place (please be as precise as possible with the timescale)

8. Please provide a summary of the facts here

9. Do you currently have legal or other representation

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

So on the 3rd of december I sent this:

Hello Anne 3rd december 2008

this is the reply to your 13th november 2008.

Item 3. on the list I have not had a phone since the end of 1997 due to lack of income and not being ablr to afford the annual charge much less call costs, as I had become a recluse by this time after my suicide attempt.

Item 5 which strand applies in my case, Disability Mental health Gender (single male no dependants) sexual Orientation Age and Human Rights

item 6 I refer you once again to my blog address for the fulll list, from being re-housed to having a public inquiry into the Criminal Negligence shown towards me by the Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff County Council, the IPCC the BBC and ITV the house of lords and various members of the Houses of parliament as none of them have been willing to raise a finger on my behalf. Aided and abetted by South Wales Police the Attorney General and the Crown Prosecution Service.

Item 7. I first began writing letters about my plight in Sept of 1999 after moving into 15 Garth Place, which culminated in a document CC99-3-2 written by an executive officer at Cardiff County Council. Needless to say the Ombudsman seriously let me down. Also I first wrote to the Welsh Assemblies 60 members in the summer of 2000 regarding Houses of multiple occupancy and its re-desigantion as Shared Houses so that many who have mental Health issues live in such properties and the difficulties that they have financially and privacy reasons and all the excessive profiteering that is allowed all because the Rateable Valuer gets away with over valueing these properties and does not take into consideration what this will mean to the tenants. A nice little earner and the vulnerable the poor paying the most for all servies. Then of course there was Feb 2002 when Taff Housing tenant support team were paid £1,000 by the Welsh assembly who I thought were there to re-house me given the threats of violence I had received from the 1 year past probationary tenant above one Stephan Watkins threatened to rip my head off, this after I had been putting up with between 5 and 7 people above in a sub-standard sound insulated property playing computer games till 0400hrs nightly during the winter months prior. Taff Housing after 3 months of do little washed their hands of me, I believe they never attempted to find me alternate accomodation, just took the money and ran. Maybe if they did not wish to support me because getting a public inquiry into thenissues would have meant that that housing association would have lost out in rent yeilds for all the houses of multiple occupancy they own, probably with sub-standard sound insulation to boot. Which finally brought me after innumerable letters to the Ombudsman to feb 2004 and my demonstrating outside the Welsh Asssembly with my Jane Hutt banner, and the game playing by the benefit agency claiming that I hadn't attended a doctors appointment at their medical. I have written enough about that since I started blogging and since I started videoing and placing them on youtube and initially on myspace. None of my emails have every been addressed by anyone, and it could be argued that investment in waterwheels for our rivers would provide per pound spent more electrical energy than the cost of the wind turbines they seem hell bent on placing every where, it would appear to me the greener option and if they had put money into research they would probably have prototypes in place by now, validating my premise. One thing Taff Hosuing support officer did do was visit ofgem with me about the quantum pre-payment card and the fact that the majority of poor people use them to buy their gas yet pay the highest premium. Still Ofgem has not forced the gas companies or the electric companies to lower the tariff, yet annually the question raises its head and no legislation to force them to lower the tariff by central government. Then the was the malicious prosecution for non-filling in of the census form by the crown prosecution service and the refusal of the solicitor payed for by the government to argue that parliament was just another public authority and that the demand to fill it in was INCOMPATIBLE with the Human Rights Act.

Item 8 I thinlk the above about covers that.

Item 9 I have been unable to find any solicitor in Cardiff who deals in Human rights abuses like the right to privacy in ones own home, or the right to not be harrassed in ones own home or the right to garantee my post I have written often enough about Mr. Watkins mail coming addressed to my tenacies address and not his own. I expect that I have missed out some details like the solicitors that I have approached who once they had contacted Cardiff County Council refused to go any further with my claims. Now I see that government is again persecuting those with mental health issues into forced labour when dealing with the working world is the last thing they require. I trust that this will be enough for you to do what it is you do. At least I hope so, but I have this feeling that like all those other agencies I approach to bring government to account you will wash your hands of me as all the others have. See the latest blog see who I sent that to and not a peep from any of the Human Right Committee members so far.

Yours David Gabriel you have my address or do you need me to print this off and hand it into your office.

So remarkably enough I had the following reply on the same day:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your e-mail, I can offer the following feedback.

If you think your human rights protected by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) have been violated, and wish to bring a claim under the HRA, your case must meet various conditions and you must comply with the procedure of the HRA. You can only bring a claim against a “public authority”. Bodies that fall under the definition of “public authority” include government departments, local authorities and health trusts as well as some private organisations carrying out public functions such as privately run prisons.

You can bring proceedings against a Public Authority as a free-standing action by way of judicial review in the appropriate court or tribunal. Secondly, you could rely on your human rights in any other legal proceedings involving a public authority in which you may already be involved.

You cannot generally directly bring a claim against an individual or private body under the HRA. However, if you are able to make a claim against them based on other grounds either in common law or statute the court may then apply the HRA to your claim if appropriate.Claims under the HRA must be brought within one year of the breach of your human rights. Extensions may only be granted in Exceptional Circumstances.

Other considerations when considering a HR claim would include:

a. Legality, does the body in question have the right to carry out the actions you outline?
b. Legitimate Aim, what legitimate aim was the body trying to achieve by taking the actions it has?
c. Proportionality, how proportionate were these actions?

So for example, although member states are subject to the Human Rights Act, they are able to carry out certain functions which relate to internal legislation. I.e. arresting an individual where they felt they had sufficient cause to suspect a crime has been committed; sectioning an individual in line with the Mental Health Act; protecting other citizens from harm etc. Therefore, the Human Rights Act does not necessarily outweigh UK law.

I would be grateful if you could clearly outline the specific breaches of the HRA which you believe would be within time limits for you to challenge. I will then pass the information along to my case work colleague for further advice. Although you have touched on a number of issues, I remain unclear as to the specific breaches of the HRA you wish to address. Please be aware as I have already stated we cannot access your BLOGS so this information cannot assist us.

Thank you for your help.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

Can anyone tell me where they find any mention of her/them not being able to access blogs prior to this????????????Cos I cannot, and can someone tell me if someone with mental health issue ought to have this rigmarole when contacting these people???

So on the same day I sent this:

Hi there Anne

I had the self same excuse from the Crown Prosecution service one Mr. Wholley regarding accessing my blogs, there is a phrase where there is a will there is a way. Not 150 metres from your office is a public library where I have previously published some of my blogs. I would suggest one of you join, copy the blogs to disc if you have to and read them then, or convesly go to an internet cafe. What your message appears to say like Mr. Whooleys is that you cannot be bothered to access them, or the videos that I have placed on youtube uses search words iamcrazydave that also you can do from the public library. If you have the will to.

This is one very fast reply of yours so I assume that it was pre-written. I somehow get the feeling that I am about to be fobed off with these time constraints. A bit like the IPCC not chasing up south Wales police for a reply to complaints, a bit like the IPCC blocking my emails. Yours as ever David

On the same day I had this reply:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your enquiry. Unfortunately, the helpline provides a telephone or e-mail advice service, based upon information individuals provide directly to staff. The helpline is currently entirely office based, I would therefore be unable to visit an outside agency to access your BLOGS.

If you require further advice, please outline as requested the specific breaches of the HRA which you believe would be within time limits for you to challenge. ?

Thank you for your help.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees ??????

All in super big lettering! In the meantime I had been emailing the human rights committee at the house of lords with a copy of my lord Ellis Thomas banner n blog here is a reply from Lord Dubs

RE: human rights committee‏
From:DUBS, Lord (
Sent:04 December 2008 11:27:06
To: david gabriel (removed for privacy reasons))

please stop sending me these messages
UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
-----Original Message-----From: david gabriel [mail removed for privacy]

That was his Lordships response to recieving this along with other members of the committee to receiving this below.

Sent: 28 November 2008 17:06
To: DISMORE, Andrew; AUSTIN, John; HARRIS, Evan; SHARMA, Virendra; SHEPHERD, Richard; TIMPSON, Edward; BOWNESS, Lord; DUBS, Lord; LESTER, Lord; MORRIS, Lord;
Subject: human rights committee

Hi there

this is one of many blogs trying to highlight the plight of both myself and the hundreds of thousands of other vulnerable adults in the uk and the total dismissal of my having any human rights what so ever. This blog will guide you all to my main catalogue page. I trust that you will be able to read between the lines and the language that I sometimes use and all the misspellings and consider the simple solutions that I have been campaigning for. Also why has there been a total reluctance by everyone so far contacted to help me with any of the issues that I have raised not least the sub-standard housing that the council see fit to house its derelicts like myself in. I can gaurantee that none of you who are married would live there for more than a week without your spouses saying this is intolerable, unless they get a turn on from the guy above hearing all your conversation and other aspects of your private life???
I hope this Criminal Negligence to my health and welfare will end soon, not afar of.

Yours David Gabriel (address removed for privacy reasons). here then is my latest blog: all you need do is click on the highlighted url's and the videos on youtube will automatically play, the same with my go to for a full list of blogs at the end. I could not find the email of the earl of Onslow or that of Baroness Stern on the committees home page so if they could be provided copies I would be grateful.

Wednesday, 26 November 2008

See blog for all the details.

So on the 4th December 2008 I sent Anne Mears-Rees this:

HI Anne

I guess just like the DLA Tribunal Service inability to access the blogs so that the Doctor on the panel might oh just might consider the detrimental effects of sub-standard housing on those with allready frought emotion, I will have to copy paste them all to you seeing as your manager isn't that interested in good investigative work to collect evidence from a client.

I think that this one might cause you pause for thought especially the PC Haines arrested part of the blog. So here it is, I think that your bright enough and know enough about the Human Rights Act to figure it out for yourself what aspects are being breeched. The right to privacy for one in my own home and all that.

I have had a complaint with the European Court of HUman rights for ages and don't know if they have even passed a judgement yet. So from time to time I have mailed them blog updates, but as they refuse to respond tvia email that they have received it or are considering it. I still like to use the title of them in the blogs. Needless to say I have heard nothing since being acquitted of the common assault charge re the cross complaint. The right to the peaceful enjoyment of ones home.

All the Best David let me know if you wish to have me send all the blogs.
Thursday, 16 October 2008

Again the full blog was sent and on the same day I sent the following to Lord Dubs:

RE: human rights committee‏
From:david gabriel (removed for privacy)
Sent04 December 2008 17:00:57
To:; (my other email account for proof of sending);

Lord Dubs

Your reply saddens me my Lord, and I can only assume that you are with this request aiding and abetting in the Criminal Negligence of myself and the breech of my Human Rights and trust that in time you will be held accountable for these things. You being a member of the Human Rights Committee n all.

Yours David Gabriel


So the same day I sent a copy of both in one email to Anne Mears-Rees with this addition:

Hi Anne

Here is something that I had in my inbox along with yours Lord Dubs is a Human Right Committee member and you would have thought that the good Lord would have been interested in Human rights abuses. David

On the 11th of December I had this from Anne:

Dear David Gabriel

Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your e-mail.

My apologies for the delayed response. Unfortunately, due to the security settings on the computer, your e-mail went to the junk mail box rather than the in box.

From the information you have provided it would appear your enquiries relate to:

· Your arrest and subsequent acquittal on common assault charges;

· Your solicitor refusing to continue representing you;

· Housing problems.

The relevant parts of the HRA which would be likely to be relevant are:

Arrest and legal representation

Article 5 Right to liberty and security which states

1 Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law:

(a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court;

(b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law;

(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so;

(d) the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority;

(e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants;

(f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition.

2 Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him.

3 Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1(c) of this Article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.

4 Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.

5 Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.

Article 6 Right to a fair trial which states

1 In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:

(a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;

(b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;

(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;

(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life

1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

I understand from your correspondence that you have made a formal complaint to the IPCC, could you please let me know which stage you are at in this process?

Have you made a complaint to the law society regarding the actions of you solicitor?

I will pass on your enquiry to a case worker and will let you know if the Commission can provide any support with these issues. In the meantime you could visit Liberties website for more information and possible avenues of assistance.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

So on the same day I replied with this:

Hi Anne
thanks for the reply.

1) The IPCC have done nothing to be of any assistance what so ever I could send you the blog that relates to that if you like, infact Sally Reibero has blocked my email you will find that in my blogs I have mentioned this and accused them of aiding and abetting criminal negligence. So for a time I was creating ficticious email accounts in order to by-pass the block, unfortunately I had to do that a number times and could only ever send it once before the notice started appearing that she had gone and blocked it again.

2) As to the Law Society you will find had you access to the blogs that I contacted them regarding their Human Rights Committee, and got the usual fob off the same incidentally as Liberty who apprently don't touch human rights issues in the UK, which I find very disconcerting. The same as it is going to be a miracle if your organisation agrees to act on mine and millions of other vulnerable adults in the UK behalf, to have our Human Rights upheld, and to stop us just being cash cows for the professional elite.

3) There is the thorny question of the officer getting away with perjury or perverting the course of justice, which nolonger suprises me given all that I have attempted to achieve, and the total lack of any support with my endeavours, but then the ciminal justice system would lose money lose sll those nolonger criminalised people cases to fill their time up with if they were really interested in social justice. No more drugies to prosecute no more non-licence fee payeres to prosecute, and they certainly would not have solicitors bailing out of cases because they might be a potential witnes. Under interrogation of the officer who handed in the transcript he could have stated that the officer had deliberately tried to mislead the court, or that the word malfeasance was ommitted three times although it was plainly audible and placed there insatead (inaudible). To my knowledge PC Haines never investigated tho allegations made by me when under caution, although they were of a criminal nature. Cardiff County Council are still playing their don't reply to emails from me game, as are the welsh assembly members of my usual suspects fame, along with various other MP and house of lords members as you have been made aware by the other email. I will wait to see if the miracle does happen, but the habit of being fobbed off by all and sundry leaves one in a place of little hope of that occuring.

David Gabriel

So on the 16th December 2008 I sent her this:

Hi Anne

I thought that I would send you the blog page where I list all the blogs that I have placed on blogger, not being familiar with the internet it is the only way I have found to host them all together, you might find the titles offer an indication of some more issues.

All the Best David

welsh assembly the crazydave files
Monday, February 06, 2006
A TALE OF CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE BY THE ESTABLISHMENT (the full blog was sent but for the record these were where I was at)



On the 13th January having heard nothing following the email above I wrote a short letter with part copy of the email for the 16th december and videod myself delivering it available on youtube at

For Anne Mears-Rees 13th January 2009

Hi Anne

Below is part copy of the email sent on the 16th December 2008. I was wondering if it had gone into the junk mail folder. It is nice to have a confirmation of receipt email back. So I am posting this in the hope that a) it will be acknowledged and b) you can tell me whether your organisation is going to act on my behalf and c) if so can I have a dedicated email address to forward to so that I know that no other emails from me will end up in the junk folder un-read.

All the Best David Gabriel you have the address

From: david gabriel (removed for
Sent: 16 December 2008 15:17:30

So on the 23rd January I received this:

waleshelpline (
Sent: 23 January 2009 08:30:04

Dear Mr Gabriel

Thank you for your mail by post. Unfortunately, it would appear that we did not receive this e-mail, it is not in the junk folder. The last correspondence we received was on the 11 December 08

As previously stated, I am not able to access your blogs. Any information you wish me to see MUST be sent by post or e-mail. Although I appreciate your frustration, in order to pursue either a Discrimination or Human Rights case the complaints procedure of the relevant organisations must be completed. It is not clear from your e-mails what stage you are at in this process. Unfortunately I am unable to progress this matter any further without this information
I would remind you that the time limit for taking a discrimination case is six months minus one day from the last act of discrimination. For Human Rights cases the time limit is a year from the breech.

Please bear in mind that the Commission receives numerous requests for legal and financial help and has limited resources. Therefore each case is assessed by strategic priority and only some cases receive the support requested.

Yours faithfully,

Anne Mears-Rees

Equality and Human Rights Commission-Wales Helpline

So on the 26th january I sent this:

Hi Anne

Here is a copy of the email you didn't apparently receive. It arrived in my alternative email, so I would suggest that it arrived in yours. I get the feeling of having the bums rush here, not what I expected. Hopefully I will forward you a copy of the latest blog where I asked a Public Question at the local Full Council meeting on the 22nd January with some Human Rights violation issues that might just get someone on my case, rather than the run around. Can you tell me the name of the overall manager of equality human rights commission in Cardiff and their email, I guess that it will have to be a freedom of info request given the circumstances in which I am writing this to you today.

Yours David Gabriel (copy of the 16th december email attached to this)

On the 27th January 2009 I sent this:

For Anne Mears-Rees asking a public question 22nd dec 2008 (1 of 3)‏

Hi Anne

Here is the first in the 3 part series (so far) relating to asking a public question at a full council meeting of Cardiff County Council. I think that you might well show your CEO these three and maybe then you can tell me if indeed the Council is violating Human Rights Legislation in either its procedural rules or the violations as outlined in the supplementary question found in 27th jan blog. If I do not have a confirmation receipt by the end of the week I will hand deliver a copy so that the excuse of these emails being either lost in the Junk Folder or never Received will not delay any action by the Equal Ops Commission.

David Gabriel
Monday, 22 December 2008

For anne mears-rees CCC violate article 10 13th jan 09 (2 of 3)‏

Hi Anne
Here is a blog posted on the 13th Jan 2009, David Gabriel

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

the Public Question asked on the 22nd jan 2009 (3 of 3)‏

Hi Anne Mears-Rees

this is my latest blog, I have yet to hear anything from anyone regarding the supplementary question that is shown below. Or have I yet to receive anything from anyone at Cardiff County Council regarding my housing situation although I was given assurances that this was taking place. Can you confirm receipt of these and your CEO email please. David Gabriel

Tuesday, 27 January 2009


For the Attention of Kate Bennett

Director for Wales

EOC Wales

Thurs 29th Jan 2009

Hi Kate

I am attaching a part copy of an email sent to Anne Mears-Rees you will note that it says one of three, needless to say that I am disfatisfied with the consideration that my complaint to the EOC has received so far, by her. Either I am being told that emails have gone in to the Junk mail section or that they have not been received at all, I have asked for a dedicated email that I can send updates with, but that has been ignored. I have the feeling that the EOC would rather not represent me in any of the complaints, much like the Parliamentary commissioner who refused to even acknowledge that I had sent him an email complaint, just one more viloation of my rights to legal representation, or to hold anyone to account in any goveernment department anywhere in this country.

So I would appreciate it if you could look at it all yourself, and whether the latest emails have gotten through or whether they have been dumpt by some member of staff, who themselves have issues with dealing with wierdo freaks like myself.

Yours David gabriel

On weds the 4th Feb 2009 I shot this video of me delivering a letter to Kate Bennett the Regional Manager for the Equal Ops In Wales available on youtube at

On the 4th Feb I received this email there was no name attached to it, so whom it came from Lord only knows:

Dear Mr Gabriel

Thank you for contacting the Equality and Human Rights Welsh Helpline.

We apologise for a delay in our reply to your enquiry.

We have received numerous e-mails from you and we thank you for your comments, however, unless you are able to provide the information requested previously we are unable to offer you any other advice.

The Equality and Human Rights Helpline is here to provide advice and information on discrimination and human rights to individuals, employers and service providers. We are unable to comment on general observations regarding discrimination issues.

Your previous queries have all been dealt with by helpline specialists and we are unable to offer any additional advice on the matters raised.

In the future, if you have any new specific enquires on Discrimination or Human Rights don’t hesitate to contact us.

Yours Sincerely
EHRC Welsh Helpline

I have to admit the about general observation regarding discrimination did kinda pee me off. Its ok if its general discrimination then is it???

On the 6th of february I received the same thing in letter form and guess what it was signed by Anne Mears-Rees which frankly bothered me alot. Not from Kate Bennett the Director for Wales of the organisation who might have explained why emails were going into junk folders or apparently never received so I photocopied the Transcript of the interview under caustion, I copied the letter from the ECHR and of course PC Haines signing that as far as he was concerned the transcript was a true representation of interview. Which it plainly wasn't neither did he come back to me when the blog address that was oh so convieniently misrepresented didn't afford him any chance of viewing them to get the right one. But then Officer Haines knew damn well what the right one was. There are other questions that relate to the Trial that I have dealt with in other blogs, so see those.

Here then is the covering letter to Kate Bennett to go with those documents.

Kate Bennett
Director for Wales
Equal Ops Commission

9th feb 2009-02-09
Hi Kate

Needless to say I was rather disappointed that you could not be bothered to reply in person to my last letter to you. Enclosed you will find the transcript from the interview under caution that PC Haines offered up to the court, knowing that in doing so he was providing false evidence to the court, and that in doing so he was involved in a criminal offence. I have supplied his signed waiver.

You will see various counter allegations made by me while under caution, allegation that PC Haines has never ever investigated to my knowledge, you will also see that my blog address details are totally wrong and that the solicitor asked would I like him to read them. Given that the blog address he has allowed to pass to the court is a fiction then how could he have ever read them? Never!

It unfortunate that I still do not have a dedicated email address where I was sure that you would receive all emails from me rather than having to deliver these letter by hand but there you go. I have also supplied you with a copy of a confirmation letter from the European Court of Human Rights, but since that I have heard nothing, even though I have sent them updates of stuff in the post. I have not had any legal help in that, no solicitors in Cardiff appear willing to defend the rights of bums like me.

Finally I am in the process of creating a blog and I have put up videos of myself delivering two letters to the EOC because I find the emails in junk folders or emails never received or unwillingness to view blogs and videos as very very disconcerting, especially considering that a high percentage of adults with mental health issues, don’t have reading or writing skills, and if I am given the run around what hope have they got.

In July 1999 I moved into this council tenancy and it still does not conform to the minimum standard for air-bourne sound insulation let alone floor to ceiling transmission values. While two attempts have been made to rectify it by the council neither have worked, in between I have had to live with harassment from n15A and 17 (removed for privacy) ever since Feb 2002, to which the council (my landlord) or the Police have allowed to go on because it pleases them to do so. In an Ombudsman letter to me when I first raised the issue of this sub-standard property they gave me assurances that the sound insulation would be brought to above standard prior to anyone moving in above. The council apparently didn’t care about that. I trust this will do for now, as I am mindful that all the delays, in dealing with any of this will take you outside of time constraints to deal at the least with officer Haines, and South Wales Police.

If you had looked at the videos on youtube then you would see why it is that I have not complained to them of PC Haines Perjury, especially when a Judge turns a blind eye along with the Crown Prosecution Service.

David Gabriel 15 (removed for privacy) Gabalfa the envelope will be marked P and C.

Written on the actual transcript were the errors of omission, as well as at the end the following:

To Kate Bennett

The Officer could never have read the blogs or watched the videos or looked at the records of my complaints since 2002 (should have added there to south wales police) Or. Mr. Trams criminal record, and or followed up on any of the criminal allegations made by me in this interview. But then as the original duty solicitor who sat thru this interview with me refused to represent me at Trial he could not question the arresting officer about the errors he has allowed in this transcript. Never have investigated anything. Neither did the locum he put in his stead one mr. Loveluck Edwards and I was not used to the situation to prompt him when under the Judges cross-examination of me to mention the errors by the officer or bring the blogs to the judges attention the harassment I have experienced from the so called well adjusted that they portray over time.

If you had full internet access you could watch the nuisance neighbour video, if you had a dedicated e-mail I could forward you one's sent to Judith Woodman of CCC which prove she was aware of the violations in the issuing of Corporate Complaint numbers and therefore lied to the Full council when she claimed she knew of no outstanding issues, plus she is a member of my 'Usual Suspects' club. Those not so great and not so good who receive copies of my latest blogs and video URL's and do nothing to help extricate me from the situation or care for breeches in this persons human rights.

So on the 10th february 2009 I shot the following video of me delivering it to the Equal Ops Commission

Now I am just waiting on the reply to that document. I trust it is specific enough, I trust that the questions raised in this blog will cause certain changes most especially with those who have mental health problems. The big question is will they take any of it on board, or will they like the parliamentary commissioner seek not to act on my behalf????

I have asked for a freedom of info request for all the other big wigs in the Equal Ops Commissions email addresses so that I can send them this blog, but I have to wait til the end of February for the decision as to whether they will allow me to have those details. Why? hasn't someone already made such a request and they know the answer???

Love n Light people in this instance its holding the cops to account, plus the judiciary that appear to find fraud amongst officers satisfactory.


Hi Everybody

Well on the 12th Feb 2009 I received the following from Kate Bennett the Equality and Human Rights Commissions national Director for Wales.

Dated the 11th Feb 09

Dear David

Thank you for your letter dated the 9 February. I understand that my colleagues working on our Helpline are already looking into the matters you have raised.

Yours sincerely
Kate Bennett

It doesn’t appear that way to me Kate, it seems like the string him along string him along till the Police issue is over the six months time scale you people have to me. Any way on the 13th Feb 2009 I sent the following email to a whole bunch of people of whom the EHRC Wales was a co-receiver the leader of the pack was my AM Jonathan Morgan, and its in reference to the blocking of my access to my youtube videos by Cardiff County Council on their Library compute terminals. Here is a copy of the email and the co-receivers emails some are wrong like ole Doc Gibbon but I like that cos the others got theirs:

Political censorship by Cardiff County Council‏
From: david gabriel (removed for
Sent: 13 February 2009 17:15:55
To: jonathan morgan (;;;; gordonbrown (;;;;;;;;;; standyourground (;;;;;;; Drive (;;;;; jenny randerson (; Julie MORGAN (;;;; Michael German (;;;;;;;;;; taxpayersalliance (;

Hi Everybody

Seeing that I have been active in placing videos on line at youtube for some time now, it came as a complete shock that Cardiff County Council are now interferring with their viewing. I have made two videos that show their daring do naughty. I guess that the videos are getting to near the bone for them to stomach being viewed. they appear to be under the illusion that once taking public office that they are entitled to the same rights to privacy that an ordinary citizen can enjoy. I wonder if any of you have the determination to prove to them that they do not, and that being a public servant opens one up to scrutiny, whether they be elected or un-elected public servants.

Or is it because its me writing this that somehow they will be able to get away with, Human rights Abuses time after time after time????????? the Right to Freedom of Expression the Right to hold a public authority to account, the right to the peaceful enjoyment of ones home, in a property that complies with building standards regulations, the right to legal representation and the right to medical treatment, in the Client lead services that they claim to aspire to.

Here is the Council Computers at the local library, where previously I have been able to annotate the videos because they used to be accessible:

Here are the same videos at an internet cafe, I find it remarkable that the council can make it look an authentic youtube no longer available message, I wonder if that's some kind of intellectual property theft on the part of the council:

For those interested in other Human Rights Violations might like to read the three blogs that deal with asking a public question and the procedural rules that negate True Accountability of Cardiff County Council and I wonder how many others around the UK are using similar devises.

See the original question that was not allowed because it related to an individual:

Asking a public question

blog 1:

blog 2:

blog 3:

As ever the full list of blogs are available at

as ever David Gabriel Oh and here are a few more for the curious:

Jonathan Morgan AM captured

Compulsory pruchase of private landlord accommodation

Questions regarding student loans/the chief constable of SWPolice

Claims of criminal negligence ignored by CCC Adult Services Committee

Refused to allow to record CCC committee meeting?

The Consumer Revolution saying NO

TV Licencing and Trade Unions Oh and so many more

On the 17th Feb 2009 I received the following letter from Anne Mears-Rees, dated the 16th Feb 2009.

Dear Mr. Gabriel
Re: Enquiry 1-3468184

Thank you for your letter dated 9th february.

As I have explained previously, before I can refer your enquiry to a case worker, I need to know at which stage you are in your complaints to the Police and to the Local Authority. I will also need to clearly know, with which of these complaints you are seeking the Commissions assistance.

In addition, I would be grateful if you could complete and return by post the attached consent form.

Yours faithfully
Anne Mears-Rees
Wales Helpline

There is no mention of the 13th of Feb email, and I wonder if the big wigs who are gonna be getting a copy of this blog shortly will ask themselves 'what the fxxx has been going on here?' or will they use the same excuse of cannot see blogs or watch videos, and quite frankly Crazydave we cannot be bothered going to an internet cafĂ© to view any of it either, so why don’t you just sit down shut up and count yourself lucky you bum, you haven’t got any Human Rights OK!

Or will one of them amaze me, and think, well what if this guy is being discriminated against. I am gonna have a look, its obvious nobody is taking any notice of his complaints and that’s surely wrong for a start off. Why is the person on the Helpline being so contrary why doesn’t she just pass it onto a case worker, its self evident that he’s being victimised at the very least.

Well I wonder if they will. Any way I have duly typed up more stuff for Anne Mears-Rees and filled out the consent form, but who to name as dealing with the complaints I’ve put none cos none are, not the European Court of Human Rights cos I couldn’t find a solicitor and I have never heard a dicky since receiving from them the confirmation of my appeal. Should I have put Claire Ovey, or what about all the interest at the Public Question by Michael Murphy of Cardiff County Council that sure evaporated quickly enough, should I write his name, or what about Chief Constable Barbara Wilding of South Wales Police seeing as she is the Commanding Officer and her Officers are being naughty boys after easy convictions, all helped along by a Crown Prosecution Service who must have known they had no chance in securing a conviction given the circumstances. Eh Solicitor dude.

Well here is the letter written same day of receipt of Anne Mears-Rees (delivered on the 20th Feb 2009)

To: Anne Mears-Rees

Equality and Human Rights Commission

17th Feb 2009

Hi Anne

In reply to your 16th Feb 2009 letter which I received today. I am at no stage with complaints regarding the Police or the Council or the Welsh Assembly or my MP, or the IPCC or Bro Taff Health Authority and that is why I came to your organisation in the hope that I would find Legal Representation from you.

The Council refuse to issue me with a Corporate Complaint number, after the Judge and the Crown Prosecution Service refused to hear the Complaint regarding PC Haines, and in light of the alligations made while under caution not being investigated, nor have others to the Police What point was there in making a comlaint to them? Same as with the body who oversee solicitors I have approached them in the past for assistance from their Human Rights committee and have posted that on my blogs.

As for the rest well they live in a world that leaves them free from all Scrutiny as anyone familiar with my blogs would plainly see. That is why I have knocked on the door of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. For the ole Right legal Respresentation reasons, that really are being denied me so far.

Attached is a copy of my 13th Feb 2009 email to Uncle Tom Cobbley n All, of which the EHRC was a co-receiver but that your 16th letter does not mention. This political censorship by Cardiff County Council stopping me from viewing my videos on Youtube and that of others now, is just one more game that CCC are currently playing on me.

I trust that this clarifies things for you. I also hope that it is now enough for you to pass it onto a case worker, who I had foolishly believed you were.

Yours David Gabriel (address rmoved for privacy)

At the base of the letter by hand I also wrote:

The complaints regarding the Police are a) Aiding and abetting CCC and the Welsh Assembly Government in Criminal Negligence towards my health n Welfare. b) Officer Haines knowingly submitting a false representation of the taped interview under caution.

The complaints regarding Cardiff County Council and the Welsh Assembly Government see a) above i.e. Criminal Negligence towards my health n welfare. Violations of the Human Rights Act.

Also I attached the 13th Feb 2009 email just in case that ended up in the Junk email folder or mysteriously got dumped and never read, I also copy pasted my South Wales Police Culpable in Criminal Negligence vid 2 posted 11 months ago as of the 17th feb 09. Where I was handing in the Berman and Jonathan Morgan Blogs as complaints. Here is the url for that video

With the new Legislation parliament passed the collecting of this kind of evidence of handing in formal complaints to the Police will now be seen as a criminal offence. Can you believe that!

The same as when officers of South Wales Police remove banners from the front of the Welsh Assembly building cos Dafydd Ellis Thomas or some other, in the future presiding officer doesn’t agree with the content of someone’s art works, filming them in the act of censoring art works, or more to the Truth Aiding and Abetting the Welsh Assembly in Criminal Negligence will from last Monday be a Criminal Offence as in this video

I guess that we really are living in a Police State, so if you are out there and you see the Police up to no good, and film them at it your more liable to prosecution than they are. Insane, that’s what this Law is, and will it stop the Police from filming you at some demonstration Oh no they will be able to have cameras on every street corner. 'There is a potential ‘free thinker’ got to make a file on them.

The Police are just Public Servants, as accountable or should be, as any other Public Servant and whoever passed this Law into Statute ought to be flogged at dawn., I can hear the Souls of the Soldiers who gave their lives, so that we might have freedom from oppression cheer that sentiment

On the same day as that was delivered I hand delivered this to cardiff county council's Michael Murphy, as ever videoing myself doing so and the url will be available as and when.

Michael Murphy
Adult Services
16th Feb 2009-02-23

Hi Michael

Sorry this is hand written. As you will know by now I have refused to attend gabalfa Clinic it’s a long story regarding a psychiatrist named Jawad.

I have been given your email as but that appears to get no replies. Hence the letter.

Could you forward me a corporate complaint number or numbers for the following.

1) Nothing has been done about a push button lighting system for the hallway n stairs at 15 (removed for privacy reasons)

2) That Judith Woodman deliberately mislead the Full Council regarding her knowledge of neglect n criminal negligence on the 22nd Jan 2009.

3) That the procedural rules violate article 10 of the Human Rights Act.

4) My computer settings have been altered on the CC Library computers so that my videos and those of others are unavailable to me. An act of Political Censorship.

5) No effort has been made to sympathetically re-house me i.e. The Criminal Negligence continues.

I would also appreciate someone initiating me having a Named Councillor, as the ones in my area are useless.

Finally can you contact me in the first instance via email at (
blahdeblah) as well as by covering letter if you must.

Yours with thanks

David Gabriel (address supplied and with held here)

END OF UPDATE LOVE N LIGHT remember for a full list of blogs go to

No comments:

Post a Comment